One page on what's actually capping your traffic.
Not a 40-page automated report with 300 warnings you'll never action. One page, written by me, naming the thing that's holding the site back and what I'd do about it first. If the answer is "nothing, keep going", I'll say that too.
A diagnosis, not a checklist.
The bottleneck, named
Most sites have one thing limiting them, not twenty. Usually it's intent mismatch, pages competing with each other, or coverage that stops short of what the search actually wanted. I tell you which one it is on your site, with the pages to prove it.
The pages that are closest
Which existing pages are sitting just outside the positions that earn clicks, and what each one is missing. This is usually the fastest traffic available to you, and it almost never requires publishing anything new.
What I'd do first, in order
Three to five things, sequenced, with a reason for the order. Written so your writer or developer can act on it without another meeting.
What I'd ignore
The advice you'll get from automated tools that doesn't matter for your site right now. Knowing what to skip saves more time than knowing what to do.
Four steps, about a week end to end.
You send the form
Your URL, your email, and one line on what you hoped the site would be doing by now. That's all I need to start.
You give me read-only Search Console access
Read-only means I can see your performance data and nothing else. I can't change settings, submit anything, or touch your site. You can revoke it the moment the audit lands.
I go through it properly
Your queries and pages in Search Console, the SERPs you're trying to win, and the pages themselves. This is me reading, not a crawler scoring.
You get one page back, within three working days
Yours to keep and act on, whether you hire me or not. If you want to talk it through, we can. If you'd rather just go and fix it, that's a good outcome too.
Why it's free
Because I can't scope work honestly without seeing the data, and neither can anyone else. Doing the audit first means my proposal is based on your actual situation rather than a guess, and it means you can judge how I think before spending anything. It's a better pitch than a pitch.
Why only four a month
Because I write them myself and a proper one takes a few hours. Four is what I can do without it turning into something automated, which would defeat the point. If this month is full, I'll tell you when the next slot is rather than rushing it.
Request your audit
Three required fields. I'll reply within one working day to confirm a slot and ask for access.
Good fits for an audit
Sites with content already published that isn't performing · teams who suspect the problem is the pages rather than the volume · anyone who's been told to "publish more" and isn't convinced · sites in competitive niches needing on-page work before anything else.
Not a good fit
Brand-new sites with no Search Console history yet, because there's nothing to read. Anyone looking for guaranteed rankings by a date. Projects where I'm not allowed to see the data. I'd rather say this now than three working days from now.
What I do with your access
Read the performance data, write the audit, and that's it. Read-only permission can't change anything on your site or in your account, and you can remove it as soon as the audit arrives. I don't publish client data anywhere.
Before you ask
What's the catch?
Do I have to hire you afterwards?
What if my site is small?
Why do you need Search Console access?
How is this different from a free tool's audit?
Four slots a month.
If this month's are gone I'll tell you straight away and give you the next date, rather than rushing one out.